Active prospecting campaign

You don’t put us
into your code.
You put us under it.

Infraveil is a backend operations control plane. It sits beneath managed applications on your Linux servers, controlling releases, service processes, managed traffic, and recovery from one operating layer.

No Infraveil SDK or source instrumentation for supported supervised services. Install the launcher, configure the service, and bring its runtime under management.

After a year of building, we’re testing that approach against real production workflows.

One runtime. Connected operating controls.
Release controlApprove and execute updates
Service supervisionProcesses, health, restart limits
InfraveilManaged runtime
Traffic policyConfigured gateway routes
Recovery controlBounded, service-aware actions
CoordinateExecute locallySupervise

The tools got deeper.
The handoffs stayed yours.

Backend operations grew from scripts and server administration into a stack of specialist products: delivery systems to ship changes, observability to understand them, incident tools to coordinate a response, and traffic controls to govern requests.

Datadog is well known for observability. PagerDuty is well known for incident response. Both now span more than those categories. Their depth is valuable; specialization is not the problem.

The work between tools is the question: an alert explains what happened, a responder decides what to do, and something still has to execute that decision on the right service. Teams own those connections.

Ship the changeUnderstand its healthControl its trafficAct when it fails

Control the runtime.
Connect the operations.

Infraveil does not begin with an SDK inside your application. Its launcher and agents operate the configured runtime on your servers. The hosted control plane coordinates the work; local components execute and supervise it.

Run the release

Select the target and approval policy, verify the managed artifact, and execute the configured install, build, and start steps.

Own the lifecycle

Start and stop managed processes, check service health, and enforce configured restart budgets rather than leaving an unbounded retry loop.

Govern the route

Apply rate limits and traffic/security policy where requests pass through configured managed gateway routes.

Operate through failure

Investigate service events and logs, coordinate incident actions, and use supported recovery or rollback paths across managed servers.

WHAT THAT CHANGES

A failed release is an operating problem—not just another alert.

The same operating layer can connect a release to the process it starts, evaluate its configured health check, stop at its restart limit, and support a recovery decision. The action and its reported result stay attached to the service instead of becoming a separate terminal task.

That breadth can consolidate deployment, supervision, managed traffic policy, and recovery work where the capabilities fit. Keep specialist tools where their depth matters. This is not a claim of feature-for-feature replacement, universal recovery, or control over traffic that bypasses the gateway.

Explore the full platform

A broad platform is not
proof of the right solution.

We’ve spent a year building the platform around this approach. This campaign is how we find out whether we’re solving a problem teams actually have, in a way they actually want to use—and what needs to change.

  1. Is this the right problem?

    Where does your team still connect tools, repeat manual work, or lose time between detecting a problem and acting on the service? If the existing stack works, we want to understand that too.

  2. Does this fit your workflow?

    Could runtime-led operations sit beneath your applications without fighting your release process, ownership boundaries, or essential specialist tools?

  3. What would you change?

    The missing capability, difficult setup step, or operating decision that would make the approach useful. Concrete friction is more useful than polite agreement.

Let’s establish the fit

Bring the workflow.
Challenge the approach.

One real release, incident, or recovery workflow is enough to start. We want to understand what works today, where the work gets difficult, and whether Infraveil belongs in that picture.

Start a conversation [email protected]

No production access is needed to have a conversation.